Baseball Randomness

Hat Stealing Umpire – 1967 World Series

Last week I was watching one of the quarterfinals episodes of Baseball IQ that had aired on MLB Network.  (If you missed it, this show pitted a representative of each MLB team plus one from MLB.com and the Hall of Fame in a single elimination trivia tournament that raised money for each team’s charity.)  Rather than just a question/answer format, the show required that each of the two contestants populate lists based on a statistical prompt from the host, e.g. “name the all-time National League home run leaders with at least 300 home runs”.  The contestants then alternated giving an answer until one of them supplied an incorrect response.

During the matchup between representatives of the D-Backs and Rockies, one of the categories prompted the contestants to name the pitchers who had at least 8 postseason wins.  As an intro to the category, they played a video of Bob Gibson – who finished his career with 7 postseason wins – striking out George Scott of the Red Sox to end game 7 of the 1967 World Series.  Included in the video was the ensuing celebration of the newly world champion St. Louis Cardinals.  Check it out here.

Did you see what happened at about the 4:31 mark?  No, your eyes are not deceiving you.  That was the third base umpire running up to the Cardinals mob and taking the hat right off the head of one of the celebrating Cardinals players.  It also appears that he had a hat in his hand before nabbing the second.  According to the baseball-reference account of this game, the third base umpire for this game was Augie Donatelli.

Augie passed away in 1990 and is credited with starting the Major League Umpires Association and was known for his quick and dramatic trigger when it came to ejecting players and coaches.  Based on this video, it appears he should have also been known for confiscating portions of uniforms from players celebrating on the field.  What would an umpire do with two Cardinals hats?  How did he get the first one?  What did he do with them after the fact – sell them, eat dinner out of them?

Sadly, I am not writing to proclaim that I have solved this mystery.  Instead, I am hoping that some aspiring baseball historian will make it their life’s goal to figure out why Donatelli took the hats and what became of them.  This LA Times article from 1987 is the only info I could find – Donatelli claims the hats were “falling off”.  Sounds fishy to me.  This post is proof that the nwe baseball season cannot come fast enough.

 

Sabermetrics

Declaring WAR on Clayton Kershaw’s 2011

One of baseball’s most distinguishing traits is the enormous number of statistics available from eras new and old.  If you are so inclined, you can find information and stats on just about any season, team, and player since professional baseball became a thing in the 1800s.  As a matter of fact, there is an entire organization called the Society for American Baseball Research (SABR for short) dedicated to recording and preserving teh history of the game.  (It is from this group’s acronym that the term “sabermetrics” was formed).  One of the best places to do this kind of research online is Baseball-Reference – you can purchase a subscription for some of the data but there are a lot of free features.

With the abundance of stats, it is inevitable that the urge will arise to compare players from all eras of baseball with each other.  However, this argument typically proves futile as one quickly realizes that many era-specific factors – such as different opponents, league size and composition, advances in equipment – affect a particular player’s stats and performance.  Does hitting 50 home runs in one season in the 1960s mean the same thing as hitting 50 home runs in a season in the 1990s?  How well do ERAs compare over the course of the 20th century?  Both are good questions, and until very recently, we were left to resort to qualitative assessments of players based on assumptions and opinions to answer them.

Fortunately, some very smart baseball minds developed a way to quantify a player’s value in a way that allows for comparisons across eras.  This quantity is known as Wins Above Replacement (or, simply WAR).  While it’s a very complicated formula involving some advanced metrics, the end result is a number that describes the value, in wins, that a play is worth to his team when compared to a replacement level player.  Put another way, it answers the question,”If Player A is unable to perform and is replaced by a minor leaguer or bench player, how many fewer (or mare in some cases) wins will his team have?”

One of the beauties of WAR is that it is context, league, and ballpark neutral.  This means that the effects of game situations, which league a player played in (AL vs. NL), and the run environments of different ballparks are accounted for in the calculations.  Rather than give you all the dirty details, I will point you to the Fangraphs library for further reading on the nuts and bolts of WAR.  As noted at Fangraphs, using one metric for player evaluation is not ideal, but WAR provides a great starting point since it accounts for all aspects of player performance – batting, baserunning, defense for hitters and runs saved (or prevented) for pitchers.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at Clayton Kershaw’s 2011 performance from a WAR standpoint and see how this campaign fares historically.  If you look at Kershaw’s player page over at Baseball-Reference, you can see that his rWAR* value for the 2011 season was 7.0.  2011 was Kershaw’s age 23 season (his age at midnight of June 30, 2011 was 23) and since the advent of the CY Young Award in 1956, there have only been twenty seasons that saw a starting pitcher with a rWAR of 7.0 or greater in their age 23 season or below.

Of those twenty, only Kershaw, Dwight Gooden in 1985 (age 20) and Roger Clemens in 1986 (age 23) came away with the Cy Young Award.  This may seem arbitrary at first glance since the Cy Young Award is determined by a vote, but the bigger picture is that Kershaw is one of three pitchers to have performed at such a high level at a young age and be perceived as the most outstanding pitcher in his respective league.

Another point worth noting is that, going back to 1880, there have only been 25 seasons in which a left-handed starter posted a rWAR of 7.0 or greater at age 23 or younger.  (Awesome side note: a guy named Noodles Hahn had two such seasons in 1899 and 1902).  Before Kershaw’s 2011, Jim Abbott’s 1991 season and Frank Tanana’s 1975-77 seasons with the California Angels were the most recent occurrences.

To reiterate, it is typically not safe to pass too much judgment based on any one statistic – Kershaw actually accumulated a lower rWAR than NL Cy Young runner-up Roy Halladay (7.4).  We can certainly begin to form ideas and make comparisons, but the analyst must be thorough before drawing any concrete conclusions.  We will continue to examine Kershaw’s success in 2011 in the next few posts by looking at the effect he had on the Dodgers as a whole and how he used his repertoire of pitches to his advantage.

*There are two accepted forms of WAR out in the baseball universe, fWAR and rWAR.  fWAR uses the Fangraphs methodology while rWAR is the version used by Baseball-Reference.  Values are very similar but use slightly different formulas.

Sabermetrics

Viewing Clayton Kershaw’s 2011 with Sabermetrics and Traditional Stats

Pitching at any level of baseball is a constant test of physical and mental strength.  At the major league level, only the catcher sees a more demanding workload.  If you have pitched at any level, then you know of the continuous focus required to navigate a pitch, a batter, an inning, a lineup, a game, a season.  For big leaguers, off days are far from “off” – conditioning, side bullpen sessions, film study.  Surely the rituals will vary for relievers and starters but you get the idea. Pitching is hard.

Every once in a while, a pitcher will have a breakout year and fool us into thinking – just for a few moments each time he takes the mound – that pitching looks easy.  Enter the 2011 version of Clayton Kershaw.  Every fifth game for the whole season, Kershaw gave the Dodgers a chance to win.  His traditional stat line looked like this:

21-5 with a 2.28 ERA and 248 K

which, by the way, was good enough for the pitching Triple Crown in the National League (he was tied with Ian Kennedy for the NL lead in wins).  This is a nice way to sum up a season, but as I mentioned in the overview post about Kershaw, we are much more capable now of identifying more meaningful metrics when it comes to analyzing and predicting a player’s performance than we were even 20 years ago.  These traditional stats are nice, but do they properly characterize a player and his performance?  You guessed it, the answer is no.

For example, pitcher wins has come under scrutiny in the sabermetrics world as being a somewhat meaningless stat.  Sure, it tells us that the pitcher’s team won the game and he was qualified to tally the win, but can we tell how the pitcher performed just by his number of wins?  Take a look at these two scenarios:

-Pitcher A throws a no-hitter and picks up a win in a 1-0 contest

-Pitcher B gives up 6 runs and walks 5 batters in 5 innings but his team scores 7 runs to qualify him for the win

Both pitchers earn a win, but Pitcher A obviously had the better performance.  The downfall is that the traditional win stat does not differentiate between these two performances.  Now stretch this over an entire season and it will quickly become clear that a traditional stat like the win can be a misleading characterization of a pitcher’s aptitude.  This is just one example of the way that traditional stats are being scrutinized in today’s baseball culture.  Not only is it becoming more practical, but it’s fun (I know, nerd alert!) to explore in more detail the more advanced stats that have been created to better understand the game.  I am still learning many of these new stats from the sabermetric world.

Now that we have established Kershaw’s dominance of the traditional stats, let’s take a look at some of his advanced metrics and compare him to the rest of the league.  Using the Fangraphs Leaderboard we can see that Kershaw is in the top 3 in the National League for:

Strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9) with 9.57 – 2nd
Walks plus hits per inning pitched (WHIP) with 0.98 – 1st
Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) with 2.47 – 2nd

The point is this: Clayton Kershaw had a fantastic year on the mound any way you slice it.  You might even reason that his traditional stats are in fact telling an accurate story since his advance metrics were also superb.

Now that we have established (briefly) that Kershaw had a stellar 2011, there are a couple directions to go in defining his success.  One avenue is to explore his season in historical context – this opens up the classic baseball conundrum of comparing players across eras.  The other is to begin exploring the nuts and bolts of how he was able to be so successful in 2011.  We will go one of these directions the next time we meet.  Until then, let me know if there are any sabermetric principles you would like to discuss.

Pitch F/X

Clayton Kershaw’s 2011 – Overview

If you were paying attention the last few seasons, it should have come as no surprise that Clayton Kershaw had the type of year he did in 2011. In each of his first three full big league seasons (2009-2011), the Dodgers’ left-handed starter has increased his season totals of strikeouts, innings pitched, and WAR. In addition to those counting stats, his BB/9 and WHIP have both decreased over the same period. As in most cases, stats (sabermetric in nature or otherwise) tell only part of the story.

You see, Kershaw is the only Cy Young Award Winner with the letters “c” and “y” in his first name (Zackary Grienke’s first name is actually Donald). Useless? Yes. But a very baseball-like piece of information.

Stats write the description of a player’s performance as it happens and with new metrics and concepts born each year, the predictive power of stats is increasing as well. Perhaps one of the most productive advances in baseball statdom is the introduction of Pitch F/X in October of 2006. Using a system of cameras invented by Sportvision, the trajectory, speed, and spin are recorded for each pitch thrown in the majors. MLB Advanced Media makes these data available to the public and they are extremely valuable for analyizing hitters and batters alike.

This is where I will attempt to begin with my amateur baseball analysis. With a background as an engineer, the physics of actual pitches meshed with the amazing number of data points make for an endless supply of explorations. With that in mind, I hope to lead off with my studies with a look at some of Kershaw’s 2011 Pitch F/X data. I am not sure exactly where it will end up, but the first order of business will be to examine his “stuff”. What pitches does he throw? What is his fastball velocity by inning? We’ll look at questions like these and probably some others as we begin to paint a picture of Kershaw’s 2011 Season.

That will serve as my tease for what will be the first in a series of posts. Until then, may spring training games fill the baseball-shaped void in your heart.

Round Ball Round Bat

Pinch Hitting for Myself

So this site has been on the DL for quite some time now. Probably one of those mysterious strained obliques that make their way around every big league clubhouse at some point in the season. It is now time for Round Ball, Round Bat to be put to use again. This time there will be a little different slant on things. Rather than a family blog with tales of baseball trips and outings, it’s going to change gears and swing more towards the analysis side of the game (according to Nicole, this should read: nerdier) with the occasional rant sprinkled in.

I have an amazing job that is totally unrelated to baseball as well as three little future stars that keep me busy so irregularity is all but guaranteed for now. That said, the plan of a regularly scheduled family blogging night should keep things moving.

With about a month left before opening day, I plan to have a couple posts on some performances from last season before the new one arrives. That’s all for now.

Ballpark Reviews · Baseball Games · Baseball Road Trippin' · The Majors

Baseball Road Trip: Game 13 in Cincinnati

The famous saying goes,”All good things must come to an end.”  Unfortunately, this was true for our trip of a lifetime.  Our final stop on this tour of America’s great ballparks brought us to Cincinnati and the Great American Ballpark.  This home of the Reds is situated right up against the Ohio River in downtown Cincinnati.

We made the trek across Ohio from Cleveland and arrived in downtown Cincinnati with plenty of time to spare.  We even had time to make the quick jaunt across the river and add Kentucky to our list of states visited on this trip.  While we didn’t have time to see much in our five-minute drive in the Bluegrass State, I am sure that there are tons of great things to do and see there (except for Major League Baseball, of course).

To take full advantage of the river view, we bought seats in the upper deck right behind home plate.  Because the demand for Reds tickets is not exactly off the charts, we were able to score some handicap seats so we didn’t have to check Chiquita’s stroller.  These seats not only afforded us a great view of the field, but they looked out over the river.  Had it been sunny, the view would have been more spectacular.

As our luck would have it, we found ourselves in a rain delay after the first inning.  However, the rain delay experience at the Great American Ballpark was unlike any other we had seen. We got to experience some of the hardest, densest rain we had ever seen.  Fortunately, we made it into the covered concourse area in time to avoid the downpour and lightning.  Paul Brown Stadium, where the Bengals attempt to field an NFL team in between jail terms, sits about a half mile west of the ballpark.  On a sunny day it can easily be seen from the upper concourse.  Not on this day.  The silhouette disappeared as the rain fell in massive amounts.

After huddling in the upper concourse for a while, we made our way down to the field level and were very pleased to find a large wall full of flat screen TVs playing all the other games from around the league that night.  Due to the rain delay, the area was packed with soaked fans, but the sight of seven simultaneous baseball games brought smiles to our faces.  After at least an hour delay, the game against the Braves eventually resumed.  Since we had a two-hour drive ahead of use, we had to call it quits in the fifth inning.

Leaving that last stadium was a bittersweet moment.  We had begun to live the dream of seeing America’s pastime in all corners of the country.  The teams, players, fans, conversations, bratwursts, rivalries, subway rides, stadiums, and baseball had taken us on a great journey.  We have aspirations to visit the remaining ballparks in the next couple years (I think there are ten left).  If the opportunity presents itself for this type of trip, there should be no hesitation.  You never know what you will see in America’s ballparks.

Enjoy the slideshow of our great trip’s last game.

http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=71649

Ballpark Reviews · Baseball Games · Baseball Road Trippin' · Stadium Tour Guide · The Majors

Baseball Road Trip: Game 12 in Cleveland

Our second-to-last stop on this grand baseball trip was at Progressive Field in Cleveland, Ohio.  We had purchased our tickets ahead of time from the Indians’ website because it was Major League Monday complete with a Rick Vaughn bobblehead giveaway.  As it turns out, our good planning was unnecessary as there were plenty of good seats available at the box office on the night of the game.  (We are used to the promotion nights at Dodger Stadium where riots break out when there are stadium giveaways.)

We were treated to a pretty good interleague game between the Indians and the visiting Milwaukee Brewers, but our baseball experience began with a tour of Progressive Field.  We walked over to the stadium from our hotel (thank you, Priceline for booking us at the Residence Inn one block from the stadium) and enjoyed a walking tour of what used to be one of the busiest ballparks in the Majors.  From 1995 to 2001, the Indians sold out 455 consecutive games, the Major League record at the time.  They have commemorated this streak by hanging this number with their retired jersey numbers in right field.  Boston’s Fenway faithful have since surpassed this mark, but it’s a nice touch for a city which saw great baseball success in the late 1990s.

Quicken Loans  Arena – the home of the NBA’s Cleveland Cavaliers – sits right next to Progressive Field, but I was very disappointed that we didn’t run into to Lebron James while we were out and about.  As a consolation, we were greeted by a 100-foot by 150-foot (approximately) poster of King James on the side of one of the surrounding buildings.  He was, of course, blowing some chalk in the air before a game.  If the Cavs had made the Finals, game 5 of would have taken place while we were there.

Nonetheless, we were treated to a great baseball atmosphere on Major League Monday.  We received our Rick Vaughn bobbleheads (Chiquita even got one) and had plenty of time to check out the park before the game.  We are pretty convinced that it was no coincidence that the Brewers were in town on Major League Monday.  Bob Uecker is a broadcaster for the Brewers and he threw out the first pitch.  Throughout the game, we were treated to clips from the movie as well as behind the scenes trivia from the classic baseball flick.

Once again we found ourselves fraternizing with fellow baseball fans.  We ditched our assigned seats and eventually found some handicap seating behind home plate on the upper deck.  We ended up sitting near a man and his teenage daughter who had just had surgery on a labrum in her shoulder.  We would not have thought twice about this except that Nicole’s dad had just had a similar surgery.  I felt bad for her as she tried to eat her awesome stadium dinner with her good arm.  At one point she kicked over her soda and I was very sad because it was Mountain Dew.

Anyways, the baseball game ended up being very entertaining.  The Brewers won the slugfest by the score of 14-12 and, as you might image, the game was not short on home runs.  Prince Fielder provided the most excitement with a line drive grand slam that put the Brewers ahead.  Our final treat was a fireworks show after the game.

Our experience in Cleveland was fantastic – here are the pictures from the tour…
http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=71649

And the game…
http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=71649